<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Energy Planning Knowledge Base &#187; Denmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://casestudies.pepesec.eu/archives/category/countries/denmark/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://casestudies.pepesec.eu</link>
	<description>Over 170 freely available case studies about European energy planning projects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Samsø: Denmark&#8217;s Renewable Energy Island</title>
		<link>http://casestudies.pepesec.eu/archives/230</link>
		<comments>http://casestudies.pepesec.eu/archives/230#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Slatcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable energy generation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pepeseckb.mdda.local/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsø began orienting island citizens about the potential and perspectives in the Energy Island project in 1998. There was a Ten Year Plan to orchestrate the project.  Eleven 1 MW wind turbines would make the island self-sufficient with electricity. They were erected in 1999-2000. The wind turbines are owned by a windmill cooperative and by individual owners.
The island is 100% self-sufficient with wind-generated electricity. About 70% of island heating needs are met with renewable energy, and the transportation energy consumption is 100% compensated by the electricity production from the offshore wind turbines.
Quite a number of people are working with plans to establish a cooperatively run farm-based biogas plant to extract biogas from the major pig farms’ slurry . This biogas will be used to produce electricity and the excess heat will be used for heating purposes.
Future plans include the transport sector, that can in part be supplied with canola oil for diesel vehicles and the island’s gasoline cars can use bioethanol or can be converted to hydrogen and electricity, when technological innovation and lower prices make large scale conversion feasible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Introduction</h3>
<p>Samsø is a 112 square kilometers island off the east coast of Denmark. Home to 4,300 residents, the island relies on renewable energy for 100% of its needs.  The island&#8217;s proposal won a Danish government competition and within ten years the community proved it could live entirely off renewable energy.</p>
<h3>Objectives and target audience</h3>
<p>In the late nineteen-nineties, the island’s inhabitants had a conventional attitude toward energy.  Most Samsingers heated their houses with oil, which was brought in on tankers. They used electricity imported from the mainland via cable, much of which was generated by burning coal. As a result, each Samsinger put into the atmosphere, on average, nearly eleven tons of carbon dioxide annually.<br />
Then, quite deliberately, the residents of the island set about changing this. They formed energy coöperatives and organized seminars on wind power. They removed their furnaces and replaced them with heat pumps. By 2001, fossil-fuel use on Samsø had been cut in half. By 2003, instead of importing electricity, the island was exporting it, and by 2005 it was producing from renewable sources more energy than it was using.</p>
<h3>Financial Resources and Partners involved</h3>
<p>Financial Resources: without any direct subsidy from the Danish government, the islanders built a 50 million Euro energy system.  80% the capital was raised from local investors, relying only on Danish laws and regulations.<br />
In the four years of construction, the total investment in RES and RUE has been 49 mill. €, 41 mill. € coming from local firms, private households and the municipality<br />
Until 2002, a national program subsidised the installation of biomass heating, solar collectors and heat pump systems, an incentive that convinced many homeowners to replace their oil furnaces and electric panel heaters.<br />
Partners Involved: Samso Energy Agency coordinated the RE development in cooperation with Samso Trade Organisation, Samso Farmers Organisation and Samso Municipality.</p>
<h3>Process</h3>
<p>The project began in 1998.<br />
Eleven 1 MW wind turbines were erected in 1999-2000 that would make the island self-sufficient with electricity. The wind turbines are owned by a windmill cooperative and by individual owners.<br />
Local public meetings and citizens groups worked to generate the broadest possible base of public support for these initiatives.<br />
Houses outside the district heating districts were given several different options. They could requisition an energy appraisal of their house, a report which gave specific suggestions for conversion to renewable energy, as well as advice on how to conserve energy by improving house insulation and installing better windows and class A electrical appliances. Until 2002, a national program subsidised the installation of biomass heating, solar collectors and heat pump systems, an incentive that convinced many homeowners to replace their oil furnaces and electric panel heaters.<br />
Several small-scale projects started after the energy island project in 1998. These investigated the viability of methane gas, disposal site gases and canola oil for vehicle transportation. During this same period, seven household windmills and three PV solar collectors systems were established.<br />
The foundation work for the ten offshore wind turbines started in 2002 and the offshore wind park was the biggest project in the renewable energy implementation plan. These wind turbines were erected to compensate for the CO2 emissions from the transport sector and to match the energy consumption in this sector. Technical solutions are not yet available that can replace all the island vehicles.<br />
The Samsø Energy Academy was built in 2006 and opened its doors for visitors in 2007.</p>
<h3>Results</h3>
<p>The dependency on energy-import has been reduced from 7.3 mill.€ per year to 4.1 mill.€.  The emission of CO2 is reduced by 140%.<br />
The number of “technical tourists” is approx. 1,000 per year, visiting the Energy Academy to learn from their experience.<br />
The island provides 70% of its heat with district heating plants. Gradually, islanders are increasingly using biodiesel for liquid fuels.<br />
For electricity, islanders installed 15 new wind turbines.  The turbines on land are owned individually by local farmers.<br />
To compensate for liquid fuels used in transportation, the islanders installed ten 2.3 MW wind turbines offshore, two of which are cooperatively owned by 450 shareholders.</p>
<h3>Critical Success Factors / Challenges</h3>
<p>During the brief summer months residents depend on the 50,000 visitors to the island. Traditional occupations for the remainder of the year, such as fishing, have been in steady decline. The move to renewables was considered essential for the &#8220;survival of the island.&#8221; The island and its year-round residents needed a new strategy.<br />
Local public meetings and citizens groups worked to generate the broadest possible base of public support for these initiatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casestudies.pepesec.eu/archives/230/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eco-city – Copenhagen, Denmark. [Urban project]</title>
		<link>http://casestudies.pepesec.eu/archives/174</link>
		<comments>http://casestudies.pepesec.eu/archives/174#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Slatcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen engagement and behavioural change initiatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pepeseckb.mdda.local/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until recently, only smaller municipalities and communities tended to adopt sustainable development policies. By contrast, large urban administrations have been less geared towards implementing policies that demand a bottom-up strategy and the active participation of local players.
Most of Europe's population live in urban areas, which account for the lion's share of resource consumption, pollution and waste. It is essential, that sustainable development becomes a concern of urban government.  A step in this direction was taken
in the 1990s, when experiments involving local administration of large urban areas were carried out all over Europe.  The strength of local administration is that the units are smaller, more efficient, less bureaucratic and closer to local residents.
The project was funded in part by the European project and is encrypted LIFE: LIFE96 ENV/Dk/344.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Introduction</h3>
<p>The aim of the project was to implement environmental policies in local urban planning by developing methods which create environmentally-sound local administration and government.<br />
The main task was to demonstrate a series of measures supporting sustainable development in an area (30 000 inhabitants) of central Copenhagen, Denmark, through co-operation between the local district council and grassroots organisations. The project delivered a manual, which can be used to disseminate practical results and experience with recycling and reuse.</p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Objectives and target audience</h3>
<p>The objective is an environmentally-sound approach to local administration through cooperation between the local authorities and the community.</p>
<h3>
Financial Resources and Partners involved</h3>
<p>The total cost of the work was € 1204740 contribution with LIFE amounted to € 602,370.<br />
The beneficiary is: District Council of Inner Nørrebro, Postboks 2238, Sjællandgade 38, DK-2200 Copenhagen N.</p>
<h3>Process</h3>
<p>The ECO-city 97–99 project was a demonstration model for the development of an environmental urban district. The project consisted of several eco-improvement actions and was based on new forms of cooperation between grass-roots organisations and the district council, increased involvement of the local community and a change in social behaviour. The goal was increased environmental awareness and shared responsibility for sustainable development in densely populated urban areas. The project involved collaboration between two local urban districts: Indre Nørrebro, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Lundby, Gothenburg, Sweden.<br />
The eco-city project supported a wide variety of projects contributing to the environment and the quality of life in the district. For example, preparatory work and a number of pilot projects eventually led to the creation of recycling centres throughout the district. The district kept green accounts, and this concept found its way into institutions and housing associations. Environmental nature-playgrounds, an environmentally-friendly timber business, green jobs and many more environmentally-sound elements were established.<br />
The project also tested ways of integrating environmental parameters into local planning and administration, and supporting the development of local environmentally-friendly production and activities.<br />
Project results, innovations and resulting new knowledge have been summarised and synthesised in a green manual as a guide to building an eco-city.<br />
The green manual has been made available to the public on the Internet, and at the same time functions as a link between the project, local users and the outside world.</p>
<h3>Results</h3>
<p>The steps taken by the eco-city project should make it more attractive to stay in the city. The project supported many environmentally-positive projects, which make the demonstration district greener than before. A number of visible, practical results were achieved, which can be divided into two main areas:<br />
1.    The development of a model of cooperation between NGOs, citizens, and the district council, in which all parties have the opportunity to use their resources optimally in working for a sustainable district.<br />
2.    Devising and implementing concrete demonstration projects, which provide much experience and can be used as tools in future comprehensive developments of sustainable urban districts in accordance with the new objectives.<br />
Practical work on the project improved the dialogue between the district&#8217;s citizens and institutions. Close and constructive cooperation was established between the district, the NGOs and the people, which is a tool for achieving more effective environmental planning.<br />
The eco-city project demonstrated the environmentally-friendly establishment of nature playgrounds/ outdoor areas, gave an overview of institutional resource consumption and enabled several institutions to achieve real savings.<br />
The waste project proved that it is possible to increase waste sorting and recycling considerably. Waste production was reduced by 40 %, in line with the original target. The project also delivered a practical framework for increasing the amount of construction waste that is recycled.</p>
<h3>
Critical Success Factors / Challenges</h3>
<p>Green training/education programmes and new jobs and businesses were created under the project. This shows new scope for a green approach to production and business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casestudies.pepesec.eu/archives/174/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
